Machine Learning - Confusion Matrix

It is a table that is used in classification problems to assess where errors in the model were made. The rows represent the actual classes the outcomes should have been. While the columns represent the predictions we have made. Using this table it is easy to see which predictions are wrong.

Confusion matrixes can be created by predictions made from a logistic regression. For now we will generate actual and predicted values by utilizing NumPy: import numpy Next we will need to generate the numbers for "actual" and "predicted" values.

In order to create the confusion matrix we need to import metrics from the sklearn module. from sklearn import metrics Once metrics is imported we can use the confusion matrix function on our actual and predicted values.

To create a more interpretable visual display we need to convert the table into a confusion matrix display.

1]) Vizualizing the display requires that we import pyplot from matplotlib. import matplotlib.pyplot as plt Finally to display the plot we can use the functions plot() and show() from pyplot. cm_display.plot() plt.show() See the whole example in action:

Example import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import numpy from sklearn import metrics actual = numpy.random.binomial(1,.9,size = 1000) predicted =

confusion_matrix = metrics.confusion_matrix(actual, predicted) cm_display =

cm_display.plot() plt.show()

The Confusion Matrix created has four different quadrants:

True means that the values were accurately predicted, False means that there was an error or wrong prediction. Now that we have made a Confusion Matrix, we can calculate different measures to quantify the quality of the model. First, lets look at Accuracy.

The matrix provides us with many useful metrics that help us to evaluate our classification model. The different measures include: Accuracy, Precision, Sensitivity (Recall), Specificity, and the F-score, explained below.

Accuracy measures how often the model is correct.

Of the positives predicted, what percentage is truly positive?

Precision does not evaluate the correctly predicted negative cases:

Sensitivity (Recall) Of all the positive cases, what percentage are predicted positive? Sensitivity (sometimes called Recall) measures how good the model is at predicting positives. This means it looks at true positives and false negatives (which are positives that have been incorrectly predicted as negative).

Sensitivity is good at understanding how well the model predicts something is positive:

How well the model is at prediciting negative results? Specificity is similar to sensitivity, but looks at it from the persepctive of negative results.

Since it is just the opposite of Recall, we use the recall_score function, taking the opposite position label:

It considers both false positive and false negative cases and is good for imbalanced datasets.

This score does not take into consideration the True Negative values: